Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 Size: How Much Storage Space Do You Need for Installation?

I remember the day I downloaded Pro Evolution Soccer 2017 like it was yesterday. My gaming laptop had been serving me well, but I was genuinely surprised when I saw that installation size - we're talking about roughly 18-20 GB for the base game, which honestly felt pretty reasonable compared to some modern titles that can eat up 100 GB or more. It got me thinking about how much storage space we really need for our gaming habits these days, especially when you consider how much these file sizes have ballooned over the years.

You know what's interesting? While I was waiting for PES 2017 to install, I found myself reading about this Filipino footballer, Ybanez, who won his first international award despite playing in a non-scoring position. It struck me as a perfect analogy for what Konami achieved with PES 2017 - they created something remarkable without necessarily scoring in the traditional sense of having the biggest file size or the most extravagant graphics. The game proved that quality doesn't always correlate with massive storage requirements. I've played both PES 2017 and FIFA 17 side by side, and while FIFA took up about 30 GB, PES managed to deliver an equally compelling experience with significantly less storage demand.

Let me share a personal experience that really drove this home for me. Last year, I was helping my nephew set up his first gaming PC - a modest machine with just a 256 GB SSD. We had to be really strategic about what games to install, and PES 2017 was one of the few major sports titles that fit comfortably alongside his other essential software and a couple of smaller indie games. The 18 GB footprint meant he could still have his Discord, Chrome with fifty tabs (as kids do), and even some school software without constantly worrying about storage space. Meanwhile, his friend who opted for FIFA had to constantly uninstall and reinstall games whenever he wanted to try something new.

The storage conversation becomes even more relevant when you consider different gaming platforms. On PlayStation 4, PES 2017 required about 21 GB, while Xbox One users needed approximately 19 GB. These numbers might seem trivial in today's landscape where games routinely demand 50-100 GB, but for people with older consoles or limited internet data caps, these differences still matter. I've personally experienced the pain of deleting precious game saves or other applications just to make room for a new title - it's like playing digital Tetris with your storage space.

What I particularly appreciate about PES 2017's approach is how it mirrors Ybanez's achievement - excellence doesn't always come from the most obvious places. While other games were busy adding 4K textures and massive open worlds that bloated their file sizes, PES 2017 focused on refining what truly matters: responsive controls, intelligent AI, and that magical "feel" that football fans crave. It's like they understood that sometimes, the most impressive performances come from working smarter within constraints rather than just throwing resources at a problem.

I've noticed this pattern across multiple PES installations over the years. PES 2016 needed around 16 GB, while PES 2018 jumped to approximately 25 GB. This gradual increase shows a developer conscious of not overwhelming players' storage while still delivering meaningful improvements. Compare this to some other sports franchises that seem to double their installation requirements with each new iteration, and you start to appreciate Konami's more measured approach.

Here's something that might surprise you - the actual download size for PES 2017 was smaller than the final installed size, thanks to compression techniques. The initial download was about 15 GB, which then expanded to the full 18-20 GB during installation. This might not sound like a big deal, but for gamers with slow internet connections or data caps, these optimizations make a real difference. I remember visiting my parents in their rural home and trying to download games on their satellite internet - every gigabyte counted, and games like PES 2017 were absolute lifesavers.

Looking back, I think PES 2017 represents a sweet spot in the evolution of sports gaming storage requirements. It's substantial enough to deliver a rich, detailed football experience while remaining accessible to players with various storage limitations. The game proves that you don't need to occupy half your hard drive to provide hours of entertainment, much like how Ybanez demonstrated that you don't need to be a goal scorer to make a meaningful impact on the pitch. In both cases, it's about working efficiently within your means and focusing on what truly matters rather than just the superficial metrics that often dominate conversations.